Watching the time
What's in a watch? Why wear one today, when there are so many other ways to keep track of time? And why is the technologically humble wristwatch still an object of fashion, fascination, craft, and the performance of social status?
I should be writing about anything else
I was going to write about the Harris-Walz 2024 US presidential campaign, before 5 November when Harris ultimately lost to 2017-2021 president Donald Trump. I was going to write about the dizzying spectacle of the 2024 Democratic National Convention, this exuberant celebration of the idea of pluralistic, multiracial democracy. A celebration where, behind the scenes, harried veterans of party politics were fielding calls from their relatives in Lebanon, fleeing or besieged by American-made bombs. And where these same party operatives were told in no uncertain terms that the three-day event would not feature any speaker who was ethnically Palestinian, as street protest about U.S.-enabled genocide in Gaza surrounded the convention center. About Harris's speech juxtaposing promises about the “dignity” of people being killed en masse with American munitions alongside a promise to maintain “the strongest, most lethal fighting force in the world.” About the suspicion that the Democratic Party's “Big Tent” was getting a little too big as it invited in ex-GOP war hawks, and yet was somehow still too small to accommodate critics of the ongoing siege on Gaza. About the resurgence of Trump's cult of personality after his successor's wrongheaded approach of tacitly delaying criminal investigations for nearly two years in hopes, it seemed, that the former president would take this as a cue to retire from electoral politics like Richard Nixon before him. About Trump's bizarre convention before the DNC, where the most prominent slogan on the signs held by his supporters was “mass deportation now”. About the collapse of civic identity and communal belonging, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, that seemed to figure into the election that followed. And heck, now I've seen Los Angeles go up in flames; maybe I should write about that.
But I'm writing about wristwatches. Sometimes it feels selfish to even think much about something so small. But over time I've learned that this kind of trivial thought is an integral part of the human experience, and under the right circumstances can even be foundational to genuine communication that leads to building strong relationships that in turn grow into actual communities. And sometimes I know what to say about the small, trivial things when I don't know what to say about bigger, more important things.
The function of a watch
I've written about the compact cassette before, and since then I've learned a lot about MiniDiscs that I might yet write up. Wristwatches (and, in particular, not the “smart” kind that serve as a secondary interface to a variety of functions of a smartphone, but the kind that basically just tell you the time) follow from these thematically in that they are built to do pretty much one thing, and for many people they have been supplanted by a smartphone that does that one thing and a great many other things too.
If you're especially distractible or even ADHD-diagnosed like I am, and you're someone who needs to check the time now and then to keep appointments or stay on task or log events, then you'll probably understand how it might be beneficial to have a source for the time that cannot also provide you with the overwhelming diversity of information that is available through a smartphone. It can also, surprisingly enough, be noticeably more accurate as a time source than your phone. I've noticed that, measured against the Network Time Protocol (NTP) system using time.gov, the system time on my Google Pixel 8 Pro appears to sync to the network when I power the phone on, but drifts severely after that and appears to sync infrequently, to the point that the system clock may be fast by a whole second by the time it has been on for twenty-four hours, and is often fast by as much as three whole seconds when it has been on for days at a time. By contrast, a typical quartz watch drifts less than one half-second per day, and the two quartz watches I wear are electronically synchronized to an accurate source at least once per day. Realistically, accuracy to within three seconds is probably good enough for most people in most situations. But to my neurodivergent mind, accuracy to within half a second of the global timekeeping consensus feels better.
A tale of two watches
There are currently two watches I rely on regularly. One of them I think of as my “everyday” watch, and the other as my more “travel-ready” timepiece. It happens that both are Casio watches. This is not sponsored content and I don't want it to turn into advertising, but the Casio brand will come up a lot here because it happens to focus a lot on a set of features that are interesting to me: solar charging, durable construction, and synchronization with external time sources. Other watch manufacturers like Citizen and Seiko also implement these features in some of their watches. The other thing about Casio is that they've made a lot of watches at sub-luxury price tiers for a while, so there are a lot of used Casio watches out there that are inexpensive relative to their construction and capabilities.
We'll start with the “everyday” watch, a discontinued model OVW-100. (See the user manual for the Casio 3721 module that runs this watch.) This was the mainstay of Casio's Overland line, which ran from March 2005 until 2012 and was characterized by field-style design, influenced by classic military watches like the United States Army's World War II-era A-11 standard-issue watch, with clear markings and large, highly readable Arabic numerals, making them easy to read in a variety of low-light conditions. The OVW-100 has a simple three-hand analog dial with a date window in place of the numeral 3; the rest of the twelve numerals are all raised slightly above the surface, with metallic silver edges filled in with white paint that luminesces pale green; the hour and minute hands are painted the same, and the ticking second hand a bright amber. All of this is on a dark green, almost black dial face, surrounded by an olive green chapter ring with clear silver markings for each second or minute. The main hint that this watch has digital innards is that instead of a crown it has two multifunctional buttons. One of these buttons illuminates two yellow LEDs set into the chapter ring for enhanced readability in the dark. A close look at the dial face reveals radial creases converging at its center, forming a faint six-pointed star. I've seen this same pattern on the solar panels attached to uncased solar-powered quartz watch movements for sale online, so I believe that's what I'm seeing when I look at this watch; the dial face itself is mostly transparent, allowing me a clear view of the solar panel beneath, which has a little cutout for the date window. All of this is protected by a mineral glass crystal and contained in a simple, almost spartan stainless steel case with 20mm standard spring bar lugs. The etched caseback is also stainless steel, and secured with four M1.5 cross-head screws. I obtained the watch with what I believe was its original two-piece strap, weathered and stained green corduroy lined with a black, leathery material. One end had a steel belt buckle and the other featured steel-lined eyelets. I still have this strap, but it feels like it's on the verge of falling apart, so I usually wear the watch on some kind of elastic nylon strap with a slide buckle instead.
What keeps this watch accurate is a built-in longwave radio receiver, which is capable of reading the JJY time signals; these are broadcast with an on-off Morse-code-like signal that broadcasts one bit per second of information. JJY is the longwave radio time system used in Japan, and broadcasts one code indicating the current Japan Standard Time (JST), including date information, every sixty seconds. It is transmitted from two sites in Japan, at 40kHz and 60kHz. The watch automatically attempts to receive one of these two signals in the middle of the night, when longwave reception is typically strongest. I live in New England, far beyond JJY transmitter range, so I sync my watch daily using a computer program I wrote that produces a weak, simulated JJY signal by exploiting wave harmonics and electromagnetic leakage from an ordinary pair of wired headphones. (My implementation of this concept is by no means the first, and there are also web and mobile applications that do the same thing.) I run this program on my laptop, which tends to be synchronized to within one-twentieth of a second from NTP. While this watch receives only JJY, other watches can also receive longwave time signals from transmission sites in Colorado, England, Germany, and Central China, each with its own format; Casio's implementation of this is branded as Multiband 6. I have also tried Multiband 6—and while it works, and is impressive, I have found that at this distance from the WWVB transmitter in Fort Collins, Colorado I have to leave the radio-controlled watch in a window overnight and even then successful reception is very hit-or-miss, dependent on weather conditions, and I have not found a Multiband 6 model that entirely matches the design qualities I prize in the OVW-100.
My “travel” watch has an entirely different aesthetic. It's the GA-B2100FC-7, a primary-color-accented, white-on-white colorway of the GA-B2100. This model is the solar, Bluetooth-capable entry in the currently popular 2100 series from Casio's G-Shock line of rugged “sports” watches. Like the other 2100-series watches, it's an octagonal model with an analog-digital hybrid display; it has two central hands, unmarked indices, a small subdial indicating either which of the watch's special modes is active or (in normal timekeeping mode) the battery charge level, and a small, digital LCD display showing the seconds and, according to the wearer's choice, either the time, the month and date, the day of the week, or configurable reminders. The versatility of the LCD display and four buttons allows the watch to offer not only more alarms than just the one offered by the OVW-100, but a few other easy-to-use time-related functions: world time, timer, and stopwatch.
The GA-B2100 is my travel watch simply because I can instantly sync it to network time through a Bluetooth link to a Casio app on my phone. Should the Casio app suddenly cease to function, there is a community-supported open source app that can also set the time on this model. On the rare occasion that I travel between time zones, I can even manually switch the watch to my destination time zone before departure, so that when I arrive there will be no ambiguity about whether it is displaying local time. If I'm traveling it can also be nice to have the watch's phone-finder feature (which will make my phone ring if it can establish a Bluetooth connection) and the option to record a snapshot of my geolocation by pressing a button. Now and then I may also wear the watch because I want access to its other functions, for example using the world time feature to reference UTC while perusing shortwave radio schedules, or precisely timing something, but most days I don't use these. Some days in the winter I wear this watch simply because it's brightly colored and I'm doing whatever I can to combat seasonal affective disorder.
The commonalities between these two watches reflects why I wear a watch. Firstly, to have immediate access to accurate time without a lot of additional information that could divert my focus. Secondly, to have a durable, wearable, tactile object for fidgeting and for grounding, simple, familiar visual stimulus. How my watch looks to others or what it signals about me in a social setting pretty much never enters into consideration. Well-tuned mechanical watch movements are feats of incredible craftsmanship built with impossibly tiny and perfectly calibrated parts, and sometimes they signify the wearer's wealth or taste. But the humble, mass-produced electric quartz movement from which both of these watches are derived is much more accurate. Both watches also improve on the accuracy of quartz timekeeping with the ability to self-synchronize to reliable, external time sources. And both watches incorporate a traditional, analog representation of the time on a relatively simple dial without many complications, within a durable case made of common, relatively low-cost materials. And both have solar charging, allowing me to wear them all the time without manually charging or changing their batteries on a regular basis.
The differences that have made the OVW-100 my preferred everyday watch over the more technologically advanced GA-B2100 also reflect what I look for in a watch. I find that an analog dial without index numerals, like the dial on the GA-B2100, is less intuitive and more effortful for me to read than an analog dial with highly visible numerals. Maybe it's low spacial intelligence, or a quirk of my neurodivergence. But I still prefer an analog dial that I find easy to read, like that of the OVW-100, more intuitive and pleasant to read than a digital readout of the time. The circular motion of the hands represents well the cyclical way in which we enumerate time based on the diurnal rotation of Earth. The spacial representation of duration as an arclength on the circumference of the dial provides an intuitive representation of passing time, allowing me to visually compare different lengths of time as they pass. The GA-B2100 has an always-visible digital representation of the current second, and can be configured to show the current time on its digital display, reinforcing its minimalist analog dial, but the OVW commits more fully to a readable analog dial with a physical second hand, prominent numerals, and no complications apart from a date window. The emphasis on readability even extends to the watch's phosphorescent markings; the numerals and the hour and second hands on the OVW-100 all bear copious and effective phosphorescent paint. I wear this watch overnight because if the small children in our house wake me up in the middle of the night I can easily read the time, even without activating the dial-illuminating LEDs. The GA-B2100 has an LED, but only its hour and minute hands are phosphorescent, making it difficult to intuit where they are pointing relative to the indices in complete darkness. With its subdial and digital display, the G-Shock also feels more “busy”, visually, than the Overland. It's not too much visual complexity for me, but it is closer to my personal limit.
A watch that doesn't exist
Based on what I have learned about my very niche, neurodivergent special interest in watches I've settled on a specific idea of what my ideal watch would look like. It would be a solar, quartz “field” watch with the dial and case of of the OVW-100 (though potentially with brighter colors), the Bluetooth connectivity of the GA-B2100, and the solar charging of both. From the research I've done, as of January 2025 such a watch does not seem to exist exactly. Some of the Citizen Eco-Drive Bluetooth models come close, but none have the prominent index numerals of a field watch. I can say the same of the Casio Oceanus OCW-T200, which also has Multiband 6 as a fallback when its Bluetooth functionality is turned off. Casio has historically used the same internal digital module with different dial and case designs to make different models in different watch lines, so I kinda hope they'll do a field watch take on the 5596 module that powers the Oceanus. Similarly, Citizen sometimes provides its movements to microbrands, and maybe one of them could take on the solar, Bluetooth-connected, three-hand W410 movement.
But I think the fact that my ideal watch doesn't exist despite being obviously technologically achievable tells me that my specific interest, taste, or use case for watches is somewhat niche. If everyone was clamoring for an analog, solar-charging watch with Bluetooth connectivity, there would be a lot more of them out there than I have found. And if everyone in the market for a watch like that also wanted it to be maximally readable in the mold of a field watch, then surely my ideal watch would exist; it would just be a matter of changing the visual design on the dial of one of these closest contenders that I've found. Judging by the landscape of available and popular watches, it would seem that most people who are going to buy a watch with Bluetooth connectivity are looking for a full-on smartwatch with a high-resolution LED display. Many of the remainder of people who would buy a plain old watch that has Bluetooth connectivity are likely expecting an at least partially digital display. And it would seem that the very small number of people who are looking for a fully analog watch with Bluetooth connectivity and solar charging are mostly looking for a watch that looks “grown-up” and congruous with business attire, communicating at least a performance of seriousness if not real wealth. And that's not what I'm looking for. I'm looking for a fidgety gadget that shows me the time.
The watch jockey
In June 2024, at the end of a work trip in Central Europe, I visited the Freud Museum in Vienna, in the apartments that served as his family home and professional practice. It has relatively little of the Freuds' personal possessions or the original furnishings the Freuds used, because the family fled Vienna as refugees in the 1930s. Amongst the exhibited artifacts is a Swiss-made gold pocket-watch, not Sigmund Freud's but asserted to represent a similar design and origin to the one he used to keep his appointments on schedule. The curator's note says that Anna Freud, his daughter and herself a foundational psychoanalyst, teasingly called him a “watch jockey” for his dedication to punctuality. Sigmund Freud strikes me as someone who understood the pleasure of fidgeting with a trivial gadget, and also someone who understood that such a thing was trivial next to whatever it was that drove him to fidget in the first place. He was also very aware of mortality; it informed seemingly all his work, and yet it seems that for him there was maybe something comforting about watching the passage of time.
Where not otherwise noted, the content of this blog is written by Dominique Cyprès and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.